I have little to say about this except it is intrusion.. Period. Although the Republican party and many of those Wall Street benefactors are so stupid and are promoting this IMO… Of course the people don’t know who is to blame because of course Obama controls everything in their eyes and all they hear is Too much government in our lives. This is nothing new though, ask any native American...their Lodges were not good enough, as they were forced to live on reservations. I feel they are weeding out the desirable and undesirables. The undesirable in their opinion Trailer park equals Trash. IF IT IS A PERMANENT RESIDENCE, You can’t do that. Some people cannot afford more than a RV or tiny house to live in. www.regulations.gov… HUD has proposed the following law: www.regulations.gov/... This proposed rule would modify the current exemption for recreational vehicles in the Manufactured Home Procedural and Enforcement Regulations. Under the current exemption, questions have arisen regarding whether park model recreational vehicles are regulated by HUD’s manufactured home program. These park models are being produced with patio roofs, screened in porches, and other extensions that exceed the 400 square foot maximum exemption in the current regulations. Additionally, some of these models are being marketed as suitable for year round living. HUD’s proposed rule would permit recreational vehicle manufactures to certify that a unit is exempted from HUD’s regulations. Specifically, HUD’s proposed rule would define a recreational vehicle as a factory build vehicular structure, not certified as a manufactured home, designed only for recreational use and not as a primary residence or for permanent occupancy, and built and certified in accordance with either the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1192-2015, Standard for Recreational Vehicles, or the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) A119.5-15, Recreational Park Trailer Standard. In addition, to provide consumers notice regarding the manufacturing standards used to construct the unit, HUD’s rule would require that units claiming the exemption display a notice that identifies the standards used to construct the unit and states that the unit is designed only for recreational use, and not as a primary residence or permanent dwelling. That’s right – if this law is passed, these structures will be classified as “not suitable for a primary residence or permanent dwelling” in April of this year.
Let us look at it from a Democratic perspective. Most of us do not agree with The government trying to tell women how to control their bodies. If given power the conservatives are trying to tell people who to love. They are trying to tell us who to worship. What’s next, mandatory Sunday School and a home created especially for another housing bubble?
They are trying to elect people via Citizens United. They are trying to tell people they can’t have access to healthcare. States and munciplities zone locally so some people cannot grow their vegetables, and many police depts. abuse and harrass people. Now the wages are not living wages and really moreso if this regulation goes into effect. This is just too much. People are angry but they are terribly confused on who to be angry with.
They have not a clue...the very people who do not want big government in their lives are the very people promoting these kind of changes on a state and local level, however, we do not need our own side telling people their houses are too small for full times residence. It leaves the door open for ..Oh.. you need 2 acres to sit your brick home upon...Oh that house is not nice enough… Oh you need to be more conformed and lock stepped. What the hell is going on?